Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 5,807 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST is ahead, 71–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Potenza S001

Summer

Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 55 · 5,807 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Potenza S001 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests79≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6375

    Potenza S001: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 62.7 = 73

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Potenza S001 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests84≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6277

    Potenza S001: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 62.3 = 76

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 51

    Snow

    Proxes ST +15
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3864

    Potenza S001: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 51

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +14
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5174

    Potenza S001: 60% × 63.3 + 40% × 51.1 = 58

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 57

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests56–
    Reviews found online59–

    Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 58.6 = 57

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +15
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests58≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4872

    Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 48.4 = 54

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Proxes ST
    Reviews found online6171
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S001Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 65 71
Dry 73 72
Wet 76 75
Snow 51 66
Comfort 58 72
Noise 57 –
Treadwear 54 69
Handling (owners) 61 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza S001

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S001

Pros

  • Precise and sharp steering response
  • Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
  • Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
  • Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.

r/CarTalkUK ·2 upvotes ·2023-11-15

“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”

mybmwi3.com ·2026-03-31

“I run the Bridgestone Potenza S001 Ultra-High Summer Peformance Tire 215/45R/20s on the rear and 195s on the front. They ride softer than stock tires. Not cheap tho.​”

bimmerfest.com ·2012-02-16

“Thanks for the comments. I'm not sure a paltry $3m fine will move BMW to more or quicker recalls. It's just a drop in the bucket for them. In this case too, BMW has yet to accept any responsibility for the tire issues and has put it all on Goodyear for warranty and replacement. This is the sort of BS thing I am expecting to happen, although unlike the LS2's, I have been assured that there are no Excellence tires to be had anywhere. I just hope they do the right thing here. The latest issue of Roundel reviews the new F30 and they claim the new Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses "third generation run-flat technology", whatever that is, and say its a great tire. I called around though, and no tire dealers even have that tire in their system yet.”

Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement

Based on 43 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes ST

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available551
Rim diameters15″ – 21″19″
Tread depth8/32″—
UTQG280 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Toyo Proxes ST

Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better snow, treadwear and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 51 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S001 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza S001 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S001 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Potenza S001 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza S001 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza S001 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology