Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 724 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 0 road tests and 724 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 724 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests | 96 | – |
| Reviews found online | 75 | – |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 96 + 40% × 74.8 = 88
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests | 95 | – |
| Reviews found online | 73 | – |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 95.4 + 40% × 72.6 = 86
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 55 | – |
| Reviews found online | 62 | – |
Potenza Sport: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 61.9 = 59
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 30 | – |
| Reviews found online | 63 | – |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 30 + 40% × 63.3 = 43
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 71 | – |
| Reviews found online | 40 | – |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 39.5 = 59
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | – |
| Source | Potenza Sport | Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests | 12 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | – |
| Dry | 88 | – |
| Wet | 86 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | – |
| Noise | 43 | – |
| Treadwear | 59 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | – |
| Efficiency | 12 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza Sport
Turanza EL400-02 RFT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community praises the Bridgestone Potenza Sport for its exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and value pricing compared to competitors. However, users frequently highlight drawbacks such as fast tread wear and poor durability when used for track days, along with some complaints regarding lower fuel economy and narrower physical dimensions.
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo - quick initial review - 250 miles Very early impression on this newly released update, used as a track tyre on my modded MX-5 done about 50 laps at Bedford Autodrome GT layout, 8-15C air temp, as well as to and from the track. Fun track tyres, great handling feedback and direct steering feel, plenty of grip when push and stable through corner. Confident under heavy braking. Track performance much improved overall compared to the PS4 previously which was quite snappy at limit. Not driven in the wet yet so cannot comment on wet performance. Not driven enough to comment on wear but seems decent after 50 laps/250 miles Road noise is louder, and side wall is stiffer compared to PS4, maybe by ~10%. Would recommend, especially if you can get them on a deal. I paid £330 for 4 corners fitted. Size was 225/45/17. The side wall is quite pretty too if you care for this. Read more”
“Due to rain later in the week I’ve only been able to put ~50 miles on them. Other tires I’ve run are the Bridgestone S02 and S03. I preferred the S02’s over the S03. PS4’s, PS Cup’s and Hankook V12’s. And Hoosier R6 at track. So far, the New Potenza Sports are outstanding. Low road noise, fantastic dry traction, turn in and braking. No wet experience yet, and hopefully never as I don’t typically drive this car in the rain. I’m going to play around with tire pressure, so if anyone has any recommendations for 997 C2 I’d love to hear.”
“I used 2 sets of 4 Potenza Sport on my daily in 225/45r17, excellent tires I don't think it can be beaten in terms of feeling (the Sport Contact 7 seems very good too but not tested), rigid sidewalls, progressive, very very easy to drive, fast even in the wet. Yes very soft rubber not for track but on the other hand in the wet close to 0°C it's incredible, much better than mid-range 4 seasons. On the rear axle (FWD daily) I did several winters with snowy days and -5/-10°C, the following year and even worn to 100% there is only aquaplaning that it can fear (be careful I didn't say it was good on snow lol, with its continuous rubber bands it's a disaster.).”
Based on 93 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport | B · Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 128 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 - 320 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Bridgestone Turanza EL400-02 RFT
Only Bridgestone Potenza Sport has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology