Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 731 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 31 road tests and 731 + 1,929 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is ahead, 89–73
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 731 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Tests 93 · 31 tests Owners 84 · 1,929 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“im on my 4th set of goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 6 and i will never go back to other brands or models. i use them on my e220d estate and as a job im uber driver and do about 7000 miles a month.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 30 tests | 96 | 96 |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 91 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 14 shared tests · wins 8–5 | 96% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 11 shared tests · wins 5–4 | 100% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–1 | 91% | 95% |
| Dry (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 91% | 98% |
| Subj. Elk Test (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 90% | 100% |
| Dry Subj. Steering Response (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 100% | 100% |
| Subj. Wet Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 90% | 80% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 74.3 = 87
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 91.1 = 94
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / 31 tests | 95 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 92 |
| Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 1–6 | 86% | 88% |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 12 shared tests · wins 3–7 | 94% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 | 100% | 94% |
| Wet (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 94% | 98% |
| Wet Lateral Stability (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 80% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 14 shared tests · wins 7–7 | 95% | 96% |
| Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 99% | 96% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) · 7 shared tests · wins 6–1 | 100% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 11 shared tests · wins 8–2 | 100% | 99% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 94.7 + 40% × 72.4 = 86
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 92
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 10 tests | 54 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 81 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 73% | 82% |
Potenza Sport: 40% × 53.9 + 60% × 60.8 = 58
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 40% × 75.7 + 60% × 81.3 = 79
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 26 tests | 30 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Interior Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 | 87% | 87% |
| Noise (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 0–9 | 96% | 99% |
| Exterior Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–1 | 76% | 90% |
| Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 88% | 84% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 30 + 40% × 63.1 = 43
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 82
No owner ratings of noise for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 7 tests | 71 | 96 |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 70 |
| Abrasion (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–2 | 67% | 82% |
| Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–4 | 68% | 89% |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 39.7 = 59
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6: 60% × 96.4 + 40% × 69.8 = 86
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 73 | 90 |
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / 26 tests | 10 | 71 |
| Energy Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 89% | 91% |
| Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 91% | 95% |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 11 shared tests · wins 0–11 | 76% | 89% |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 89 |
| Dry | 87 | 94 |
| Wet | 86 | 92 |
| Comfort | 58 | 79 |
| Noise | 43 | 82 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 86 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 90 |
| Efficiency | 10 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza Sport
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 15 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza Sport finished ahead 6 times and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 9 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | Dry | 91% | 98% | −7.1 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 98% | −1.9 | 8–5 in 14 shared tests Newest: 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout · 225/40 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 99% | +0.2 | 5–4 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 91% | 95% | −4.2 | 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Dry Subj. Steering Response | Dry | 100% | 100% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Subj. Elk Test | Dry | 90% | 100% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Subj. Wet Circle | Dry | 90% | 80% | +10.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 86% | 88% | −2.5 | 1–6 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 95% | −0.7 | 3–7 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet | Wet | 94% | 98% | −3.7 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% | 96% | −1.8 | 7–7 in 14 shared tests Newest: 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 99% | 96% | +3.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% | 95% | +4.5 | 6–1 in 7 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 99% | +0.8 | 8–2 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 100% | 94% | +5.6 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Wet Lateral Stability | Wet | 100% | 80% | +20.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 73% | 82% | −9.0 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Exterior Noise | Noise | 76% | 90% | −14.3 | 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2023 AUTO Straßenverkehr 2023 Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18 |
| Interior Noise | Noise | 87% | 87% | +0.4 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 96% | 99% | −3.3 | 0–9 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 88% | 84% | +4.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 67% | 82% | −14.7 | 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 68% | 89% | −21.1 | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Energy Consumption | Efficiency | 89% | 91% | −2.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 EV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 91% | 95% | −3.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 76% | 89% | −12.8 | 0–11 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 64% | 68% | −4.0 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #10/10 | #1/10 | – | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 59% | 77% | −18.9 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 90% | 83% | +7.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19 |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 100% | 99% | +1.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19 |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 94% | 95% | −0.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19 |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 100% | 91% | +9.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19 |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 86% | 82% | +4.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test · 235/55 R19 |
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 95% #2/9 · 2025 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/52 | #6/52 | – | 6–9 in 15 shared tests Newest: 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout · 225/40 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community praises the Bridgestone Potenza Sport for its exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and value pricing compared to competitors. However, users frequently highlight drawbacks such as fast tread wear and poor durability when used for track days, along with some complaints regarding lower fuel economy and narrower physical dimensions.
“Just replaced my set of Potenza Sport AS. 2 side wall failures with 70% tread left. Replaced them with Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4s. Michelin's are a much better riding tire than the Bridgestones. A little more road noise though.”
“Trying Bridgestone Potenza Sports for summers with simple Spirt Edition A19 wheels Last fall I put Blizzaks WS90s on the stock rims, and had a confident time this winter. I love the stock Mazda rims and intended to swap on a set of performance summer tires. However decide to go with aftermarket wheels that match the stock as much as I could afford, so here they are. 19X8 SPORT EDITION A19 DARK GREY 225/45R-19 BRIDGESTONE POTENZA SPORT I love the look of the new rims maybe even more than the stock now that they are on simple as they are. Will have to see how the tires behave. I may decide to go back to a set of Conti DwS HiPer All-Seasons next year. Read more”
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Anybody running potenza sports? My rear right tire inside sidewall got shredded suddenly at highway speed (85+ mph). Fortunately I did not lose control and was able to move the car to a nearby school parking lot with a spare. Ordered a set of DWS06+ and they should be delivered tomorrow. The tires are a little more than 4 years old and had about 12k miles on them. Kind of bummed at the situation, but this could’ve been much worse. Are potenza sports generally that bad? Read more”
Based on 93 community posts
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier UHP summer tyre with strong dry grip, good wet performance and rim protection. It is often recommended as a comparable or better-value alternative to the Michelin PS5. Reservations include a harsh ride and poor comfort for non-sporty daily use, a harshly negative Swedish test of cold-weather braking, concerns about wear and track use, and isolated vibration and EV-rating questions.
“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
“you could fit them but they are not NF rated, only 5 is NF0 and NF1 rated but on the 21" sized for the sedan.”
“Hi guys thanks for your input and sharing what you are using. I have gone for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with 20% off so worked out around £150 each fitted.”
Based on 29 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 128 | 130 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 320 A - AA A | 260 - 300 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 78 | 78 |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — better efficiency, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 71 vs 10 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 82 vs 43 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 86 vs 59 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 79 vs 58 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport won 8 of 11 shared wet handling tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 92 vs 86 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 94 vs 87 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 82 vs 43 on our noise score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 79 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 86 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, 71 vs 10 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology