Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 733 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 0 road tests and 733 + 50 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza Sport is ahead, 75–40
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 28 tests Owners 63 · 733 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 52 in 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout (dry braking)
“Replacement tires. Bridgestone Potenza Sport. 8k miles. Fronts/Rears. WTF Bridgestone? Or is it me? No burnouts!”
Tests – · none yet Owners 28 · 50 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests | 96 | ≈ 48 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 20 |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 96.3 + 40% × 74.4 = 88
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT: 60% × 48.1 (est.) + 40% × 19.8 = 37
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 27 / – tests | 95 | ≈ 44 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 22 |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 94.8 + 40% × 72.3 = 86
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT: 60% × 44.2 (est.) + 40% × 22.3 = 35
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 56 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 25 |
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 24.6 = 43
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 54 | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 10 |
Potenza Sport: 40% × 53.8 + 60% × 60.7 = 58
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT: 40% × 56.9 (est.) + 60% × 10 = 29
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / – tests | 30 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 28 |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 30 + 40% × 62.8 = 43
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 28.1 = 51
No road tests of noise for Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 49 |
Potenza Sport: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 39.6 = 59
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 73 | – |
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 26 / – tests | 10 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 40 |
| Dry | 88 | 37 |
| Wet | 86 | 35 |
| Snow | – | 43 |
| Comfort | 58 | 29 |
| Noise | 43 | 51 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | – |
| Efficiency | 10 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza Sport
Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community praises the Bridgestone Potenza Sport for its exceptional dry and wet grip, sharp steering response, and value pricing compared to competitors. However, users frequently highlight drawbacks such as fast tread wear and poor durability when used for track days, along with some complaints regarding lower fuel economy and narrower physical dimensions.
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Anybody running potenza sports? My rear right tire inside sidewall got shredded suddenly at highway speed (85+ mph). Fortunately I did not lose control and was able to move the car to a nearby school parking lot with a spare. Ordered a set of DWS06+ and they should be delivered tomorrow. The tires are a little more than 4 years old and had about 12k miles on them. Kind of bummed at the situation, but this could’ve been much worse. Are potenza sports generally that bad? Read more”
“Just moved to set a set of CSC7's. 265/35/20 and 305/30/20. They were a really good price. I moved from the Bridgestone Potenza Sport which is also a great tyre, but it becomes unpredicatable sub 12ºC or so, which is a shame. So far, the Conti's have been great and I'm keen to see how they handle the supercharger. The latest reviews of the CSC7 are really good - scooping all the top spots. Sadly the PS4S is old in comparison now, which can be seen in recent reviews with the new Goodyeaar Eage F1 Asymetric 6 and Pirelli P Zero PZ4 often ranking above the Michelin in test scores. That's not to say the Michelin has suddenly become bad - it is still a great tyre, it is just that there are now alternatives out there; most likely why the new Pilot Sport S 5 is coming soon.”
“Just replaced my set of Potenza Sport AS. 2 side wall failures with 70% tread left. Replaced them with Michelin Pilot Sport A/S 4s. Michelin's are a much better riding tire than the Bridgestones. A little more road noise though.”
Based on 93 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 128 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 24″ | 18″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 320 A - AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport — better dry, wet and comfort. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT if noise matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 88 vs 37 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 86 vs 35 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 58 vs 29 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT scores 51 vs 43 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 86 vs 35 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 88 vs 37 on our dry score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-2 EMT, 51 vs 43 on our noise score.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 58 vs 29 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport, 59 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology