tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Continental Cross Contact A/T — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 199 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza ER300 is ahead, 67–62

Check price on Amazon · Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Turanza ER300 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6762

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Turanza ER300 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6963

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Snow

    Turanza ER300 +12
    53
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6241

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Turanza ER300 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6360

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 66

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Turanza ER300 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 66

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza ER300 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/T
    Reviews found online6562
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Turanza ER300Continental Cross Contact A/T
Relative Score 67 62
Dry 67 64
Wet 69 64
Snow 65 53
Comfort 66 65
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 66 65
Handling (owners) 65 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Turanza ER300

Cross Contact A/T

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryTuranza ER300Cross Contact A/TΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD #7/7 2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza ER300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
  • Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking

Cons

  • High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
  • Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 review

Tire B Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 B · Continental Cross Contact A/T
CategorySummerAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available23—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better snow, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 69 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 67 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 69 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or Cross Contact A/T?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology