Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 199 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Firestone FR710 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Turanza ER300 is ahead, 67–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Turanza ER300 +2245Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 67 32 -
69
Wet
Turanza ER300 +2247Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 69 39 -
65
Snow
Turanza ER300 +1550Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 62 37 -
66
Comfort
Turanza ER300 +1551Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 63 34 -
68
Noise
Turanza ER300 +860Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 70 50 -
66
Treadwear
Turanza ER300 +1650Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 67 40 -
65
Handling
Turanza ER300 +2639Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 FR710 Reviews found online 65 39
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Firestone FR710 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 48 |
| Dry | 67 | 45 |
| Wet | 69 | 47 |
| Snow | 65 | 50 |
| Comfort | 66 | 51 |
| Noise | 68 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 50 |
| Handling | 65 | 39 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER300
FR710
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B FR710
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Firestone FR710 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Firestone FR710
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 39 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 67 vs 45 on dry.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 69 vs 47 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 66 vs 50 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.