Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 199 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 vs Michelin Primacy 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 199 + 13,422 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4 is ahead, 80–68
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 77 · 13,422 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Well my answer is none of the above. You choose, they are all a lottery imo. I just bought some Michelin Primacy 4 for mine today. Size 215/55 R18”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Primacy 4 +1482Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 68 75 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 68
Primacy 4: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 82
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Primacy 4 +1383Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 70 80 Turanza ER300: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Primacy 4: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 79.5 = 83
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 62 – Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 66
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
Primacy 4 +1276Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 62 76 Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64
Primacy 4: 40% × 75.4 + 60% × 75.8 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Primacy 4 +371Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 70 ≈ 66 (est.) Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68
Primacy 4: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Primacy 4 +1381Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 70 75 Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 68
Primacy 4: 60% × 84.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 81
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Primacy 4 +1175Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Reviews found online 64 75 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison93Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 93
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 80 |
| Dry | 68 | 82 |
| Wet | 70 | 83 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 64 | 76 |
| Noise | 68 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 81 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 75 |
| Efficiency | – | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Turanza ER300
80
/ 100
Primacy 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza ER300 | Primacy 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | #4/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity
- Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
- Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking
Cons
- High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
- Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
- Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
Tire B Primacy 4
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
- Low road noise and a very quiet, comfortable ride
- Reliable and consistent wet and dry grip
Cons
- Vague, numb, or floaty steering feel with soft sidewalls under hard cornering
- High price point compared to competitors
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or harsher ride as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Primacy 4
The Michelin Primacy 4 is generally praised for its comfortable ride, low road noise, and strong braking and safety in both dry and wet conditions. While many users report excellent tread longevity across tens of thousands of kilometers, some note faster wear on heavier electric vehicles or rough surfaces. It is viewed as a premium touring tire that is unsuitable for winter conditions, prompting some drivers to weigh its high price against newer models like the Primacy 5 or cheaper alternatives.
r/ItalyMotori
·1 upvote ·2026-03-26
“Gomme alternative a Primacy 4 Buongiorno, ho una Peugeot 208 del 2020 con delle Michelin Primacy 4 205/45 R 17 88 V, le ho da 4 anni, circa 20000km all’anno tranne quest’anno che non le ho sostituite con le invernali e che quindi dovrei portarle ad usura completa con il prossimo “giro” delle gomme per altri 20000km. In totale arriverò a quasi 100000km, quindi super ammortizzate e le consiglierei sempre anche per la tenuta. Visto che entro fine estate pensavo di sostituirle tutte e quattro, vorrei capire se ci fossero delle alternative un più economiche ma altrettanto valide (un cambio gomme al momento mi costa circa €650-700). Read more”
vwvortex.com
·2026-09-12
“I might try to have a look at one today. There are two Uniroyal shops near me. Whether they have one in stock to look at though...? The trouble is they look really nice online but I'd like to see them in the flesh first. The old tyres (above photo) that were on these wheels were that nice square edged profile that I like, much the same as the Michelin Pilot Sports. These are going on my sons Golf EV so I'm also trying to consider if they are A rated for fuel, the best wet grip I can find and the lowest decibel level. The best choice I can find is the Michelin Primacy 4 which are A, A and 68. But on Black Circles it says they were designed for BMW. I'm sure they fit any wheel but do those properties still hold? I've always bought Pilots but B, B and 72, and its this 72 that really bugs me, is whats making me invest so much time into getting the right tyre for Toms EV. I'm getting a Tesla this Tuesday which does in fact come with the Pilots so they must be good on EV's anyway. Who knew buying tyres was so complicated.”
r/carIndia
·7 upvotes ·2026-03-26
“Michelin Primacy 4 or Conti UC6 - Virtus GT Hey, i recently got a Virtus GT with stock Apollo alnac 4g tyres - looking to upgrade them. As per ChatGPT my options are Michelin Primacy 4 and Continental UC6 - budget is not really a problem. Overall i want good grip, handling, comfort and low cabin noise. Not going for Pilot Sport 4, because don't want to compromise on comfort for performance when i am not going to push my car too much, hence PS4 is a no no. But read it somewhere that with Primacy 4, there is a noticeable difference in mileage not sure if it means going up or down. Need recommendations on what i should get! Thanks in advance”
Top themes
#ride comfort and low noise#tread life and durability#wet and dry grip#EV tire compatibility#Primacy 4 vs Primacy 5#poor winter and snow performance#premium pricing and alternatives
Based on 43 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 23 | 57 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Sizes in common | 16 | 16 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
80
/ 100
Michelin Primacy 4
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 82 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 83 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 76 vs 64 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Tire B · Michelin Primacy 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza ER300 or Primacy 4?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza ER300 or Primacy 4?
Michelin Primacy 4, 83 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza ER300 or Primacy 4?
Michelin Primacy 4, 82 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Turanza ER300 or Primacy 4?
Michelin Primacy 4, 71 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza ER300 or Primacy 4?
Michelin Primacy 4, 76 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza ER300 or Primacy 4?
Michelin Primacy 4, 81 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology