Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 36 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza Serenity+ is ahead, 68–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Turanza Serenity+ +1353Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 65 45 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53
No road tests of dry for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Turanza Serenity+ +1851Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 68 44 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51
No road tests of wet for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
Turanza Serenity+ +954Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 59 44 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 63
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 54
No road tests of snow for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
67
Comfort
Turanza Serenity+ +1453Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 46 Turanza Serenity+: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 67
Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.7 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 74 – Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
75
Treadwear
Turanza Serenity+ +2253Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 81 45 Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 75
Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Turanza Serenity+ +1646Why this score
Source Turanza Serenity+ Energy Saver A/S Reviews found online 62 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ | Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 52 |
| Dry | 66 | 53 |
| Wet | 69 | 51 |
| Snow | 63 | 54 |
| Comfort | 67 | 53 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 75 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Turanza Serenity+
Energy Saver A/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza Serenity+
Pros
- Significantly reduced road noise and a quiet ride
- Impressive tread wear and long-term durability
- Reasonable and competitive pricing
Cons
- Mediocre wet weather grip and potential for hydroplaning at higher speeds
- Numbs steering feedback with slower response times
- Prone to understeer during spirited or limit driving
Tire B Energy Saver A/S
Pros
- High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
- Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
- Reliable dry weather traction for some users
Cons
- Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
- Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ | B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+
Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 75 vs 53 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 69 vs 51 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 62 vs 46 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 67 vs 53 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?
Which is better in the wet, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 69 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 66 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 63 vs 54 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 67 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 75 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology