Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza Serenity+ is ahead, 68–52

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Turanza Serenity+ +13
    53
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6545

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 66

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.5 = 53

    No road tests of dry for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Turanza Serenity+ +18
    51
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6844

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51

    No road tests of wet for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    Turanza Serenity+ +9
    54
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5944

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 63

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 54

    No road tests of snow for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Turanza Serenity+ +14
    53
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6546

    Turanza Serenity+: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 67

    Energy Saver A/S: 40% × 64.8 (est.) + 60% × 45.7 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Turanza Serenity+ +22
    53
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online8145

    Turanza Serenity+: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 75

    Energy Saver A/S: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza Serenity+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Energy Saver A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza Serenity+ +16
    46
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza Serenity+Energy Saver A/S
    Reviews found online6246
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ vs Michelin Energy Saver A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza Serenity+Michelin Energy Saver A/S
Relative Score 68 52
Dry 66 53
Wet 69 51
Snow 63 54
Comfort 67 53
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 75 53
Handling (owners) 62 46

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Turanza Serenity+

± 8

Energy Saver A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza Serenity+

Pros

  • Significantly reduced road noise and a quiet ride
  • Impressive tread wear and long-term durability
  • Reasonable and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Mediocre wet weather grip and potential for hydroplaning at higher speeds
  • Numbs steering feedback with slower response times
  • Prone to understeer during spirited or limit driving
All owner themes in the Turanza Serenity+ review

Tire B Energy Saver A/S

Pros

  • High fuel economy and rolling efficiency
  • Potential for high mileage in specific driving conditions
  • Reliable dry weather traction for some users

Cons

  • Significant hydroplaning tendencies in wet conditions
  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of premature wear
  • Excessive road noise and audible squealing during cornering
All owner themes in the Energy Saver A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth12/32″—
UTQG600 A A—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+

Michelin Energy Saver A/S

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Energy Saver A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 75 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 69 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 62 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+ scores 67 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 69 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 66 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 63 vs 54 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 67 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza Serenity+ or Energy Saver A/S?

Bridgestone Turanza Serenity+, 75 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology