tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs Yokohama C Drive2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 15 + 0 road tests and 1,124 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Weather Control A005 EVO is ahead, 73–64

Check price on Amazon · Weather Control A005 EVO or C Drive2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Tire ABridgestone

Weather Control A005 EVO

All Season

Tests 70 · 15 tests Owners 63 · 1,124 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (wet braking (concrete))

Yokohama C Drive2
Tire BYokohama

C Drive2

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 31 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Weather Control A005 EVO +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests79≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6961

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 79 + 40% × 68.9 = 75

    C Drive2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of dry for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    Weather Control A005 EVO +17
    67
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests90≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 74.6 = 84

    C Drive2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 46

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests38–
    Reviews found online58–

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 37.5 + 40% × 57.9 = 46

  4. 67

    Comfort

    C Drive2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests68≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6566

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 65.3 = 67

    C Drive2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for C Drive2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Weather Control A005 EVO. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    C Drive2 +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests59≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4760

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 46.8 = 54

    C Drive2: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for C Drive2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Weather Control A005 EVO +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2
    Reviews found online6761
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Weather Control A005 EVOYokohama C Drive2
Relative Score 73 64
Dry 75 63
Wet 84 67
Snow 46 –
Comfort 67 68
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 54 62
Handling (owners) 67 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Weather Control A005 EVO

C Drive2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryWeather Control A005 EVOC Drive2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/16 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 #7/10 2015 Auto Bild 215/55 R16 Technical Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Weather Control A005 EVO

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
  • Quiet operation and low road noise
  • Improved ride comfort and compliant, softer sidewalls

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, particularly on front-wheel-drive or electric vehicles
  • Softer compound can result in increased roll during cornering or a floaty feel on the highway
  • Reports of cracking or tread block separation over time
All owner themes in the Weather Control A005 EVO review

Tire B C Drive2

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration damping
  • Low road noise levels
  • Strong wet weather performance for most users

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Handling can feel vague or lack feedback for performance-oriented drivers
  • Sudden loss of grip at the limit
All owner themes in the C Drive2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO B · Yokohama C Drive2
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available823
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″ – 18″
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

Yokohama C Drive2

Winner: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama C Drive2 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 84 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 75 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama C Drive2 scores 62 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 67 vs 61 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama C Drive2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Weather Control A005 EVO or C Drive2?

Which is better in the wet, Weather Control A005 EVO or C Drive2?

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, 84 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Weather Control A005 EVO or C Drive2?

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, 75 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Weather Control A005 EVO or C Drive2?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Weather Control A005 EVO or C Drive2?

Yokohama C Drive2, 62 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology