Head-to-head Updated

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 15 road tests and 3,362 + 32 owner reviews. How we score

AllSeasonContact 2 leads, 82–80 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

AllSeasonContact 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 85 · 31 tests Owners 80 · 3,362 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Iskustvo sa Continental AllseasonContact 2 Kupio ih u 10 mjesecu prošle godine zasada sam izrazito zadovoljan kako su se pokazale kroz zimu,pa me zanima kako su se vama pokazale kroz vise godina,pogotovo kroz ljeto.”

Kleber Quadraxer 3
Tire BKleber

Quadraxer 3

All Season

± 4

Tests 80 · 15 tests Owners 79 · 32 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tyre Test (snow handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 9 tests that measured dry braking for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 0 and Quadraxer 3 won 9 (average 92% vs 96% of the best).
  • In 9 tests that measured wet braking for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 9 and Quadraxer 3 won 0 (average 97% vs 91% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured dry handling for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 3 and Quadraxer 3 won 2 (average 99% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 0 and Quadraxer 3 won 5 (average 92% vs 97% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured wet handling for both, AllSeasonContact 2 won 5 and Quadraxer 3 won 0 (average 99% vs 94% of the best).
  1. 83

    Dry

    Quadraxer 3 +2
    85
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 15 tests8789
    Reviews found online7979
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 0–992%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–299%98%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%70%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 83

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.5 = 85

  2. 91

    Wet

    AllSeasonContact 2 +9
    82
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 30 / 15 tests9482
    Reviews found online8782
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–484%91%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 0–592%97%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%60%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 9 shared tests · wins 9–097%91%
    Wet Circle (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–098%94%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–099%94%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 93.6 + 40% × 86.7 = 91

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 81.5 + 40% × 81.8 = 82

  3. 81

    Snow

    Quadraxer 3 +1
    82
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 24 / 10 tests8586
    Reviews found online7675
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 1–395%95%
    Snow Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–097%96%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–399%98%
    Snow Slalom (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–196%96%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–396%97%
    Snow Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–080%70%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 75.7 = 81

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 75.4 = 82

  4. 87

    Comfort

    AllSeasonContact 2 +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 5 tests9261
    Reviews found online8382
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–095%76%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 40% × 91.5 + 60% × 83.3 = 87

    Quadraxer 3: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 82 = 74

  5. 74

    Noise

    AllSeasonContact 2 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 23 / 10 tests7976
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–299%99%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 78.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 74

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 75

    Treadwear

    Quadraxer 3 +1
    76
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 5 tests7772
    Reviews found online7480
    Abrasion (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–370%89%
    Wear (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 2–276%70%

    AllSeasonContact 2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 73.9 = 75

    Quadraxer 3: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 80.1 = 76

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    AllSeasonContact 2 +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Reviews found online8177
  8. 84

    Efficiency

    AllSeasonContact 2 +7
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 24 / 10 tests8477
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%97%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 3–294%93%
Scores at a glance
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental AllSeasonContact 2Kleber Quadraxer 3
Relative Score 82 80
Dry 83 85
Wet 91 82
Snow 81 82
Comfort 87 74
Noise 74 72
Treadwear 75 76
Handling (owners) 81 77
Efficiency 84 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

AllSeasonContact 2

± 4

Quadraxer 3

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 12 tests that ran both, Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 12 times and Kleber Quadraxer 3 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryAllSeasonContact 2Quadraxer 3ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% 96% −4.2 0–9 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling Dry 99% 98% +0.9 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% 70% +20.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 84% 91% −7.3 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% 97% −4.8 0–5 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Braking Wet 97% 91% +6.3 9–0 in 9 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Circle Wet 98% 94% +3.8 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling Wet 99% 94% +4.9 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% 60% +40.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 95% 95% +0.3 1–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Circle Snow 97% 96% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Handling Snow 99% 98% +0.2 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 80% 70% +10.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Snow Slalom Snow 96% 96% +0.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Snow Traction Snow 96% 97% −0.5 2–3 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 95% 76% +18.8 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 99% 99% 0.0 2–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 70% 89% −19.4 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wear Treadwear 76% 70% +5.8 2–2 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% 97% −0.9 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/50 R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 94% 93% +0.5 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #13/15 #6/15 – 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 59% 64% −5.7 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Road Rating (tester's mark) Other 80% 60% +20.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #1/9 #8/9 – 12–0 in 12 shared tests Newest: 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 · 195/55R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AllSeasonContact 2

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and short braking distances
  • High level of ride comfort with excellent bump absorption
  • Noticeably quiet and refined cabin noise compared to predecessors

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can result in delayed steering response or a less sharp initial turn-in feel
  • Faster tread wear reported by some users, particularly on front-wheel-drive or heavier vehicles
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage or delamination from severe potholes
All owner themes in the AllSeasonContact 2 review

Tire B Quadraxer 3

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Strong wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • Reliable traction and safety in light snow and winter conditions

Cons

  • Tread compound can harden or degrade in performance over multiple years
  • Increased road noise and roar reported at higher highway speeds (above 135 km/h)
  • Occasional reports of reduced grip or cracking as the tire reaches the end of its lifespan
All owner themes in the Quadraxer 3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Positive

The community generally rates the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its wet grip, comfort, quietness, durability/mileage and capable all-weather performance including snow and Alpine ski trips. It is frequently chosen over the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Pirelli Cinturato SF3, though some users report weaker aquaplaning as tread wears, road noise on rough roads, and premature edge wear or cracking on front tyres.

Top themes
#Wet grip#Comfort and quietness#Snow and winter capability#Comparison with CrossClimate 2#Comparison with Pirelli SF3#Front tyre edge wear#Tread life and durability#Aquaplaning at low tread

Based on 70 community posts

Tire B

Kleber Quadraxer 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B · Kleber Quadraxer 3
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available13871
Rim diameters15″ – 22″14″ – 20″
Sizes in common5656

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Kleber Quadraxer 3

Narrow edge: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — better comfort, wet and efficiency. Where the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 87 vs 74 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 91 vs 82 on wet.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scores 84 vs 77 on efficiency.

Pick tire B Your priority is dry braking

Kleber Quadraxer 3 won 9 of 9 shared dry braking tests.

Tire A · Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Tire B · Kleber Quadraxer 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Which is better in the wet, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 91 vs 82 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 83 vs 85 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 82 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 87 vs 74 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 76 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, AllSeasonContact 2 or Quadraxer 3?

Continental AllSeasonContact 2, 84 vs 77 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology