Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Falken ZE914 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ZE914 is ahead, 72–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BFalken

ZE914

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 99 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    ZE914 +10
    74
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6ZE914
    Reviews found online6277
  2. 65

    Wet

    ZE914 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6ZE914
    Reviews found online6376
  3. 71

    Comfort

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6ZE914
    Reviews found online7273
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    ZE914 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6ZE914
    Reviews found online6570
  5. 63

    Handling

    ZE914 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6ZE914
    Reviews found online6375
Scores at a glance
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Falken ZE914: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Falken ZE914
Relative Score 65 72
Dry 64 74
Wet 65 74
Comfort 71 71
Treadwear 65 68
Handling 63 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ComfortContact CC6

ZE914

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B ZE914

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
All owner themes in the ZE914 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Falken ZE914
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Falken ZE914

Winner: Falken ZE914 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZE914 scores 75 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken ZE914 scores 68 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Falken ZE914

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Leads

ZE914

Amazon