Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 2,495 reviews
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +1680Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 62 76 -
65
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +1378Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online 63 76 -
71
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +170Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 72 71 -
–
Noise
No comparison63Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 61 -
65
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +873Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 65 69 -
63
Handling
Ventus Prime 4 +1174Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 63 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 76 |
| Dry | 64 | 80 |
| Wet | 65 | 78 |
| Comfort | 71 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 63 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 73 |
| Handling | 63 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
ComfortContact CC6
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ComfortContact CC6
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is overwhelmingly positive, with users praising its wet and dry grip, value compared to premium brands like Michelin, and overall touring performance. While some users question the variance in longevity estimates across different professional tests, real-world feedback confirms strong reliability and satisfaction.
r/AutomobileRO
·2 upvotes ·2025-03-23
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Longevity and mileage#Price to performance ratio#Comparison with Michelin Primacy#Touring tyre characteristics#EV compatibility
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental ComfortContact CC6
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 64 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 73 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.