tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 55 + 2,521 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 76–64

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Prime 4 or ComfortContact CC6 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 71 · 2,521 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 65 (est.)83
    Reviews found online6073

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 63

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 82.7 + 40% × 73 = 79

    No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +14
    77
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 65 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6175

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 74.5 = 77

    No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    ComfortContact CC6 +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7167

    ComfortContact CC6: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.4 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–58
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 65

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 66 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6567

    ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.5 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

    No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +10
    72
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Reviews found online6272
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    84
    Why this score
    SourceComfortContact CC6Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–84
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ComfortContact CC6Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 64 76
Dry 63 79
Wet 63 77
Comfort 71 69
Noise – 61
Treadwear 65 74
Handling (owners) 62 72
Efficiency – 84

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ComfortContact CC6

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ComfortContact CC6

Pros

  • Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
  • Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
  • Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
  • Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ComfortContact CC6 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ComfortContact CC6

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

r/TireQuestions ·1 upvote ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16

“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
r/croautomobili ·1 upvote ·2026-09-23

“Top top top guma, stavio prosle godine kad sam kupio auto, odmah na Kupres isao, snijega i leda bilo dosta, ali izdale me nisu Imam i ljetne hankook ventus prime 4 isto odlicna guma”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
UTQG—200 - 420 A A

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ComfortContact CC6

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better dry, wet and handling. Where the Continental ComfortContact CC6 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 79 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 77 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 72 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ComfortContact CC6 or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 77 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 79 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology