Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ComfortContact CC6 65, Dynapro HP 64.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
ComfortContact CC6 +362Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 63 59 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
Dynapro HP +368Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 67 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +665Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 72 61 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 65 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
63
Handling (owners)
ComfortContact CC6 +657Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Dynapro HP Reviews found online 63 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 64 |
| Dry | 65 | 62 |
| Wet | 65 | 68 |
| Comfort | 71 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ComfortContact CC6
Dynapro HP
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 14 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ComfortContact CC6
Hankook Dynapro HP
Too close to call: Continental ComfortContact CC6 and Hankook Dynapro HP are within 2 points overall. Continental ComfortContact CC6 is stronger on comfort, handling and dry. Hankook Dynapro HP is stronger on wet. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 63 vs 57 on handling.
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 62 on dry.
Hankook Dynapro HP scores 68 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ComfortContact CC6 or Dynapro HP?
Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or Dynapro HP?
Hankook Dynapro HP, 68 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or Dynapro HP?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or Dynapro HP?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 71 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or Dynapro HP?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology