Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 46 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF1 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Proxes CF1 +469Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 70 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
65
Wet
Proxes CF1 +772Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 63 72 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
71
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +269Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 69 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 71
Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
ComfortContact CC6 +362Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 65 60 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF1 +669Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 Proxes CF1 Reviews found online 63 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 69 |
| Dry | 65 | 69 |
| Wet | 65 | 72 |
| Comfort | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
ComfortContact CC6
69
/ 100
Proxes CF1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental ComfortContact CC6
69
/ 100
Toyo Proxes CF1
Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ComfortContact CC6 or Proxes CF1?
Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or Proxes CF1?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or Proxes CF1?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or Proxes CF1?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or Proxes CF1?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology