Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 54 reviews
Yokohama S306 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama S306 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 54 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
ComfortContact CC6 is ahead, 65–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
ComfortContact CC6 +361Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 62 57 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64
S306: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61
No road tests of dry for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
ComfortContact CC6 +956Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 62 51 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65
S306: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 56
No road tests of wet for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
71
Comfort
ComfortContact CC6 +1655Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 73 48 ComfortContact CC6: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.6 = 71
S306: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55
No road tests of comfort for ComfortContact CC6 or S306. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
ComfortContact CC6 +561Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 S306 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 65 57 ComfortContact CC6: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
S306: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for ComfortContact CC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for S306. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
ComfortContact CC6 +1449Why this score
Source ComfortContact CC6 S306 Reviews found online 63 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama S306 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 58 |
| Dry | 64 | 61 |
| Wet | 65 | 56 |
| Comfort | 71 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
ComfortContact CC6
58
/ 100
S306
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ComfortContact CC6
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
Tire B S306
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and handling
- High tread longevity and durability
- Stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback
Cons
- Consistently poor wet weather traction
- Harsh ride quality and high road noise
- Tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama S306 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Continental ComfortContact CC6
58
/ 100
Yokohama S306
Winner: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama S306 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 55 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 63 vs 49 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 65 vs 56 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama S306
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ComfortContact CC6 or S306?
Which is better in the wet, ComfortContact CC6 or S306?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 65 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ComfortContact CC6 or S306?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 64 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ComfortContact CC6 or S306?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 71 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ComfortContact CC6 or S306?
Continental ComfortContact CC6, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology