Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 541 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiCrossContact LX 2 69, Eagle Sport All-Season 68.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 541 reviews
“Go for it. They have a rebate upto $120 at a GY store. These are the new redesign for the Eagle GT. Better treadwear, traction and ride comfort.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Eagle Sport All-Season +372Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 69 74 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69
Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 72
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +171Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 72 71 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +358Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 54 51 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61
Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 58
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +264Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 61 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
Eagle Sport All-Season: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.4 = 64
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 67 Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
No road tests of noise for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +467Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 74 67 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71
Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
70
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +466Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Eagle Sport All-Season Reviews found online 70 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 68 |
| Dry | 69 | 72 |
| Wet | 72 | 71 |
| Snow | 61 | 58 |
| Comfort | 66 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Eagle Sport All-Season
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Eagle Sport All-Season
Pros
- Excellent dry traction and sharp cornering responsiveness
- Long tread life and solid overall durability
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier alternatives
Cons
- Below-average wet traction and susceptibility to hydroplaning as tread wears
- Poor performance in snow, ice, and freezing winter conditions
- Increased road noise, humming, or roaring as the tires age
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season
Community feedback on the Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season highlights its strong value, competitive pricing, and solid traction, handling, and treadwear expectations. While noted as an improvement over older designs like the Eagle GT, discussions around the ROF (run-flat) version indicate some concerns regarding a stiffer ride compared to conventional non-run-flat alternatives.
“There is a noticeably difference in handling from 17” to 19”, from 18” to 19” not so much. The cornering is cleaner, sharper and more precise. The runflat will make the ride quality worst, the 18” ride quality is not much better than the 19”. The 19” will probably get damage easier. If we were talking conventional tires, then going from 19” to 18” will make bigger difference in ride comfort.”
“So i have a 2009 Scion TC (purchased exactly 6 years ago) which just hit 43k miles. As you can see i baby my car and i use public transportation to work. That being said the stock turanzas are toast. actually running Kuhmo Ecsta supras on the back and stock bridgestones on the front So that leaves me in the market for 4 new tires. After driving myself crazy i've basically narrrowed it down to 3 (tire size is 215/45/17) Michelin Premier A/S : Via Sam's 128 per Tire Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season after current promotions at Sears $83 a tire Continental TrueContact havent shopped this hard yet I mean as of right now it looks like the Goodyears would win out of sheer price per tire but im not crazy about Sears automotive work. I will be getting an alignment and road hazard HELP!!!”
Based on 10 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season
Too close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 and Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is stronger on treadwear and snow. Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season is stronger on dry.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 61 vs 58 on snow.
Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season scores 72 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?
Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season, 72 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 61 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology