Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 541 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiCrossContact LX 2 69, Eagle Sport All-Season 68.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle Sport All-Season

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 541 reviews

“Go for it. They have a rebate upto $120 at a GY store. These are the new redesign for the Eagle GT. Better treadwear, traction and ride comfort.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Eagle Sport All-Season +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6974

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 72

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7271

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5451

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61

    Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 58

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6561

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66

    Eagle Sport All-Season: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.4 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–67

    Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7467

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71

    Eagle Sport All-Season: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle Sport All-Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Eagle Sport All-Season
    Reviews found online7066
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season
Relative Score 69 68
Dry 69 72
Wet 72 71
Snow 61 58
Comfort 66 64
Noise – 67
Treadwear 71 67
Handling (owners) 70 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

± 7

Eagle Sport All-Season

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Eagle Sport All-Season

Pros

  • Excellent dry traction and sharp cornering responsiveness
  • Long tread life and solid overall durability
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier alternatives

Cons

  • Below-average wet traction and susceptibility to hydroplaning as tread wears
  • Poor performance in snow, ice, and freezing winter conditions
  • Increased road noise, humming, or roaring as the tires age
All owner themes in the Eagle Sport All-Season review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season

Positive

Community feedback on the Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season highlights its strong value, competitive pricing, and solid traction, handling, and treadwear expectations. While noted as an improvement over older designs like the Eagle GT, discussions around the ROF (run-flat) version indicate some concerns regarding a stiffer ride compared to conventional non-run-flat alternatives.

Top themes
#ride stiffness and run-flats#value and pricing#traction and handling#treadwear longevity#comparison to Eagle GT#wheel size impact

Based on 10 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3963
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—560 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season

Too close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 and Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is stronger on treadwear and snow. Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season is stronger on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 61 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season scores 72 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?

Goodyear Eagle Sport All-Season, 72 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 61 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Eagle Sport All-Season?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology