Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
ContiCrossContact LX 2 is ahead, 70–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +762Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 70 59 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +468Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 72 67 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 55 – ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 61
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +365Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 61 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +465Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Dynapro HP Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 71 65 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69
Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +1257Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Dynapro HP Reviews found online 69 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 64 |
| Dry | 69 | 62 |
| Wet | 72 | 68 |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Dynapro HP
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Dynapro HP
Pros
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
- Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
- Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)
Cons
- Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
- Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
- Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Hankook Dynapro HP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 14 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Hankook Dynapro HP
Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 57 on handling.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 62 on dry.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro HP?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro HP?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro HP?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro HP?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Dynapro HP?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology