Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 278 owner reviews. How we score
ContiCrossContact LX 2 is ahead, 69–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2544Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 69 31 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.7 = 44
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2151Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 72 44 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 72
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +853Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 54 41 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 61
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2244Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 65 32 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison54Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 36 Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +3437Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 74 18 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 71
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +1851Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 69 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 47 |
| Dry | 69 | 44 |
| Wet | 72 | 51 |
| Snow | 61 | 53 |
| Comfort | 66 | 44 |
| Noise | – | 54 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 37 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Crugen HP71
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Crugen HP71 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
Based on 52 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 17 | 17 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 37 on treadwear.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 44 on dry.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 66 vs 44 on comfort.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 72 vs 51 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Crugen HP71?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 72 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Crugen HP71?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Crugen HP71?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 61 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Crugen HP71?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 66 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Crugen HP71?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology