Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Kumho KL33 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 435 owner reviews. How we score

ContiCrossContact LX 2 is ahead, 70–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho KL33
Tire BKumho

KL33

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 435 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +9
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6955

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    KL33: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 60

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7260

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71

    KL33: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6557

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66

    KL33: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +19
    52
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online7444

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 71

    KL33: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.5 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for KL33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +12
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
    Reviews found online6957
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Kumho KL33: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Kumho KL33
Relative Score 70 59
Dry 69 60
Wet 71 63
Snow 61 –
Comfort 66 61
Treadwear 71 52
Handling (owners) 69 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

± 8

KL33

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B KL33

Pros

  • Good value for money with competitive pricing
  • Strong initial dry and wet grip/traction
  • Comfortable and smooth ride quality

Cons

  • Premature tread wear and short lifespan
  • Serious structural concerns including tread chipping, chunking, and delamination
  • Road noise increases significantly as the tire wears down
All owner themes in the KL33 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Kumho KL33
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3918
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Kumho KL33

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 63 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Kumho KL33

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 or KL33?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or KL33?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or KL33?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 69 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or KL33?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or KL33?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology