Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Michelin Defender LTX M/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 28 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Defender LTX M/S is ahead, 79–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 83 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Defender LTX M/S +1079Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 69 84 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 74.7 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 79
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Defender LTX M/S +1182Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 72 86 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 78.8 (est.) + 40% × 85.6 = 82
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
Defender LTX M/S +1374Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 54 77 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 61
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.7 = 74
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Defender LTX M/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Defender LTX M/S +975Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 78 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66
Defender LTX M/S: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.7 = 75
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Defender LTX M/S +980Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Defender LTX M/S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 74 86 ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 71
Defender LTX M/S: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Defender LTX M/S +1382Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Defender LTX M/S Reviews found online 69 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 79 |
| Dry | 69 | 79 |
| Wet | 71 | 82 |
| Snow | 61 | 74 |
| Comfort | 66 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 80 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Defender LTX M/S
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Defender LTX M/S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2020 ViBilagare SUV Tyre Test | #3/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Defender LTX M/S
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, often exceeding 60,000 miles
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride quality
- Strong traction and secure handling in wet, dry, and moderate snow conditions
Cons
- High initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Subpar off-road performance, specifically struggling in mud, sand, and loose gravel
- Limited ice performance compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Michelin Defender LTX M/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Michelin Defender LTX M/S
Winner: Michelin Defender LTX M/S — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender LTX M/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 74 vs 61 on snow.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 69 on handling.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 82 vs 71 on wet.
Michelin Defender LTX M/S scores 79 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 82 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 79 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 74 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Defender LTX M/S?
Michelin Defender LTX M/S, 80 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology