Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST leads, 71–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Proxes ST +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7075

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Proxes ST +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7277

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    Proxes ST +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5564

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 61

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6674

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7172

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 69

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Proxes ST
    Reviews found online6971
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 69 71
Dry 69 72
Wet 72 75
Snow 61 66
Comfort 68 72
Treadwear 69 69
Handling (owners) 69 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX 2

Proxes ST

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available391
Rim diameters15″ – 20″19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Toyo Proxes ST

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes ST — better snow, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 61 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 61 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology