tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 28 + 35 owner reviews. How we score

ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads, 69–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Geolandar H/T G056 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6973

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7270

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 72

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5450

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 61

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Geolandar H/T G056 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6569

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.5 = 66

    Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–72

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7463

    ContiCrossContact LX 2: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    ContiCrossContact LX 2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar H/T G056
    Reviews found online6968
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Relative Score 69 67
Dry 69 71
Wet 72 70
Snow 61 58
Comfort 66 69
Noise – 68
Treadwear 71 64
Handling (owners) 69 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX 2

± 7

Geolandar H/T G056

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
  • Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand

Cons

  • Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
  • Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
  • Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX 2 review

Tire B Geolandar H/T G056

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry pavement handling and stability
  • Impressive tread longevity for many users

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
  • Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
  • Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Geolandar H/T G056 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3956
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056

Narrow edge: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear and snow. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 71 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 61 vs 58 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 61 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX 2 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2, 71 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology