Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 28 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads, 69–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +271Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 70 74 -
72
Wet
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +270Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 72 69 -
61
Snow
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +259Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 55 51 -
68
Comfort
Geolandar H/T G056 +270Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 67 70 -
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online – 72 -
69
Treadwear
ContiCrossContact LX 2 +366Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 71 66 -
69
Handling
Level69Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX 2 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 69 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 68 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 72 | 70 |
| Snow | 61 | 59 |
| Comfort | 68 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 66 |
| Handling | 69 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiCrossContact LX 2
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong wet and dry road grip and braking performance
- Good capability for light off-roading, gravel, and sand
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in deep snow, ice, or heavy mud
- Can exhibit loud road noise and a harsh ride on rough or damaged roads
- Cornering precision can feel reduced at higher speeds
Tire B Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 39 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Too close to call: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 and Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is stronger on treadwear.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.