Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 35 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 35 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber AT3 is ahead, 73–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Grabber AT3 +1471Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 52 78 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
59
Wet
Grabber AT3 +1372Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 55 78 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 59
Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 78.3 = 72
No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Grabber AT3 +1575Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 53 73 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 60
Grabber AT3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 73.2 = 75
No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
57
Comfort
Grabber AT3 +1875Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 51 78 ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57
Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 78 = 75
No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Grabber AT3 +872Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 60 ≈ 67 (est.) ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64
Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
52
Treadwear
Grabber AT3 +2375Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 43 82 ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 42.8 = 52
Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.5 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Grabber AT3 +2774Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Reviews found online 47 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison53Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 53
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX | General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 73 |
| Dry | 57 | 71 |
| Wet | 59 | 72 |
| Snow | 60 | 75 |
| Comfort | 57 | 75 |
| Noise | 64 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiCrossContact LX
Grabber AT3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX
Pros
- Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
- Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
Tire B Grabber AT3
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
- Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
- Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiCrossContact LX
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber AT3
Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.
“I feel not many people in this group will like this but I'll post for the hell of it. Some 215/60/17 general grabber at3 I fitted to my A4 to test if it would fit from the standard 225/50/17”
“I have at3’s on my 19 f250 , I love them 23,000 miles on them and maybe I’m halfway into the tread life . I’m easily getting at least 40,000 miles out of them probably close to 50,000 till I get a new set .”
“I have ran the cooper at3 and they are great for a mostly highway tire. I just put the grabber a/tx on but don't have many miles on them yet, went with then because they are more aggressive than the at3 but not as heavy and crazy like my previous st maxx. I have no experience with falken. For what you need it if you're tires the AT3s will be good, they are not loud. My new generals have a bit more noise.”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX | B · General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 77 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 680 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX
General Grabber AT3
Winner: General Grabber AT3 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber AT3 scores 74 vs 47 on handling.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 52 on treadwear.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 57 on comfort.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 60 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 71 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology