Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 35 + 251 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber AT3 is ahead, 73–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber AT3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber AT3

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)

“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Grabber AT3 +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)66
    Reviews found online5278

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 71

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Grabber AT3 +13
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 62 (est.)68
    Reviews found online5578

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 59

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Grabber AT3 +15
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)77
    Reviews found online5373

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 60

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 73.2 = 75

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Grabber AT3 +18
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5178

    ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65.9 (est.) + 60% × 51.3 = 57

    Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 78 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Grabber AT3 +8
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)76
    Reviews found online60≈ 67 (est.)

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 64

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Grabber AT3 +23
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4382

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 42.8 = 52

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.5 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber AT3 +27
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Reviews found online4774
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–53
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs General Grabber AT3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXGeneral Grabber AT3
Relative Score 57 73
Dry 57 71
Wet 59 72
Snow 60 75
Comfort 57 75
Noise 64 72
Treadwear 52 75
Handling (owners) 47 74
Efficiency – 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiCrossContact LX

± 7

Grabber AT3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B Grabber AT3

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
  • Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
  • Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
All owner themes in the Grabber AT3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber AT3

Positive

Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.

Top themes
#tread life and durability#gravel and off-road performance#ride comfort and low noise#snow and loose terrain grip#tire damage and sidewall integrity#fitment and tire pressure

Based on 20 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · General Grabber AT3
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available477
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG680 A B—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

General Grabber AT3

Winner: General Grabber AT3 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber AT3 scores 74 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 60 on snow.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Tire B · General Grabber AT3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 71 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology