Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 8 reviews
Continental CrossContact A/TR vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 8 + 251 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber AT3 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
CrossContact A/TR +171Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 74 78 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72
Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 78 = 71
No road tests of dry for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
CrossContact A/TR +172Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 74 78 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 73
Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 78.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison75Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 73 Grabber AT3: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 73 = 75
-
66
Comfort
Grabber AT3 +975Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 65 77 CrossContact A/TR: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.5 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 72
No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
67
Treadwear
Grabber AT3 +976Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 67 82 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.6 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Grabber AT3 +374Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Reviews found online 71 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison52Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Grabber AT3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact A/TR | General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 73 |
| Dry | 72 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 72 |
| Snow | – | 75 |
| Comfort | 66 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact A/TR
Grabber AT3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact A/TR
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and mileage longevity, with multiple users reporting over 70,000 to 80,000 miles (or 130,000 km) of use.
- Impressive dry grip and confident handling.
- Strong performance in snow and winter conditions, with some users highlighting exceptional traction on ice and steep gradients.
Cons
- A stiffer, more jarring, and less comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires.
- Mixed feedback regarding hydroplaning resistance and heavy winter snow usage.
- Potential customer service and warranty claim challenges regarding premature tread wear.
Tire B Grabber AT3
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
- Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
- Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
- Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental CrossContact A/TR
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber AT3
Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.
“I have at3’s on my 19 f250 , I love them 23,000 miles on them and maybe I’m halfway into the tread life . I’m easily getting at least 40,000 miles out of them probably close to 50,000 till I get a new set .”
“I've always used KO2s but was getting really low miles out of a set on my 1 ton van for some reason. Switched to AT3s and pretty happy with them.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by porsche man Only got 32K on them and installed General Grabber AT3. Took a 2000 mile trip and I think the all terrain tires ride better and look bad ***. I have about 50,000 on my General Grabber A/T 3s 275 45 R20 They did ride so much better and not much sound at all. Great tires in snow and unstable terrain and sticky goo! I just had them rotated, tires were at 5/32 left, not quite to the bars. So I should get another 10,000 out of them, but they will be into the bars by then. I have noticed about the last 2000 miles, they are getting feathered and they are getting loud. I will see how much of it I can take before changing. But, I love them and they do look awesome!”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact A/TR | B · General Grabber AT3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 35 | 77 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 - 680 A A - B | 560 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 31 | 31 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact A/TR
General Grabber AT3
Narrow edge: General Grabber AT3 — better comfort and treadwear. Where the Continental CrossContact A/TR is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental CrossContact A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 66 on comfort.
General Grabber AT3 scores 76 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact A/TR or Grabber AT3?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber AT3?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact A/TR or Grabber AT3?
General Grabber AT3, 76 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology