tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 is ahead, 71–59

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +14
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5577

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5975

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5462

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +10
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5475

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6373

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4675

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +20
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXDynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online5171
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXHankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 59 71
Dry 59 73
Wet 61 74
Snow 60 65
Comfort 62 72
Noise 66 70
Treadwear 54 71
Handling (owners) 51 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact LX

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available429
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″13/32″
UTQG680 A B560 A B
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Winner: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology