tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 9 road tests and 35 + 1,377 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 81–56

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport 4 SUV or ContiCrossContact LX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Summer

± 5

Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,377 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)

“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +29
    86
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 61 (est.)86
    Reviews found online5186

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 85.8 = 86

    No road tests of dry for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +32
    91
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 62 (est.)93
    Reviews found online5586

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 59

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 86.4 = 91

    No road tests of wet for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)54
    Reviews found online5171

    ContiCrossContact LX: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.5 = 56

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54 + 60% × 70.5 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    ContiCrossContact LX +6
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 66 (est.)53
    Reviews found online60≈ 66 (est.)

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 64

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 58

    No road tests of noise for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 52

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +20
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 58 (est.)77
    Reviews found online4365

    ContiCrossContact LX: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 52

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.3 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiCrossContact LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 47

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 SUV +36
    83
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Reviews found online4783
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact LXPilot Sport 4 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–64
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LXMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Relative Score 56 81
Dry 57 86
Wet 59 91
Snow 60 –
Comfort 56 64
Noise 64 58
Treadwear 52 72
Handling (owners) 47 83
Efficiency – 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiCrossContact LX

± 5

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact LX

Pros

  • Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
  • Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
  • Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
  • Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact LX review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and safety in both wet and dry conditions
  • Precise steering response and enhanced cornering stability for heavy SUVs
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and overall handling

Cons

  • Higher-than-average purchase price
  • Increased road noise reported by some users as the tread wears down
  • Faster tread wear and shorter mileage lifespan under aggressive driving or heavy vehicle loads
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Positive

Community members generally praise the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV for its strong grip, handling performance, and SUV-specific design. Users frequently consider it an upgrade over OEM options like the Latitude Sport 3, though some discuss its premium price, summer temperature limitations, and expected tread longevity.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-02-01

“From 3 model you mention, only Alenza is designed for heavy vehicle/SUV, so longevity is better than other 2 for your Envoy even though the traction may not be the best. If you can find Pilot Sport 4 SUV, then it may be the best to replace Latitude Sport 3. I like Latitude Sport 3, the best in wet weather and great in dry, but it is true it is only 25000 miles lifetime.”
r/PorscheMacan ·1 upvote ·2026-04-04

“I'm leaning towards the Pilot Sport 4 SUV over the LS3. I'd really like to see how much better these tires grip. Although it sounds like I'll be sacrificing a little comfort, but with air suspension I'm not too worried.”
r/Howsmytire ·1 upvote ·2026-07-15

“Used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV I am looking to buy these used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires. They have 7+ mm thread left, DOT 0923. I am wondering why the two tires on the right are so rough / full of small holes, while the ones on the left are so smooth. Probably the right ones were on the front, but still what could this condition be indicating? I still haven't been to the shop to see them and feel how is the rubber, wanted to hear an advice first.”
Top themes
#grip and handling#SUV-specific performance#tread life longevity#Latitude Sport 3 comparison#summer tire limitations#premium pricing

Based on 25 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available465
Rim diameters16″ – 18″17″ – 23″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG680 A B220 - 320 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Continental ContiCrossContact LX if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 52 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiCrossContact LX or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, ContiCrossContact LX or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiCrossContact LX or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiCrossContact LX or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Continental ContiCrossContact LX, 64 vs 58 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiCrossContact LX or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 64 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiCrossContact LX or Pilot Sport 4 SUV?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology