Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 35 reviews
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 77–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 83 · 10 tests Owners 72 · 39 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Primacy 4+ +1978Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 54 72 -
61
Wet
Primacy 4+ +1879Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 58 76 -
60
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 54 – -
62
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +1173Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 55 72 -
65
Noise
Primacy 4+ +772Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online 62 – -
54
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +2882Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) – 90 Reviews found online 46 70 -
51
Handling
Primacy 4+ +1768Why this score
Source ContiCrossContact LX Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 51 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 77 |
| Dry | 59 | 78 |
| Wet | 61 | 79 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 62 | 73 |
| Noise | 65 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 82 |
| Handling | 51 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiCrossContact LX
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiCrossContact LX
Pros
- Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
- Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 680 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiCrossContact LX
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 82 vs 54 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 59 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 61 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 68 vs 51 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.