Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 44 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Nexen N6000 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 44 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC5 is ahead, 74–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC5 +1163Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 78 60 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74
N6000: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
76
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC5 +1264Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 78 61 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 76
N6000: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC5 +1262Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 76 58 ContiMaxContact MC5: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.4 = 74
N6000: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC5 +960Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 N6000 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
N6000: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N6000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
76
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC5 +2254Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 N6000 Reviews found online 76 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | Nexen N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 62 |
| Dry | 74 | 63 |
| Wet | 76 | 64 |
| Comfort | 74 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC5
N6000
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
Tire B N6000
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry-weather traction and handling
- Competitive noise levels compared to other budget alternatives
Cons
- Inconsistent and sometimes dangerous wet-weather grip
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by many users
- Noticeable decline in performance as tread depth decreases
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | B · Nexen N6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | — | 300 AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Nexen N6000
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 76 vs 54 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 76 vs 64 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 74 vs 62 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 74 vs 63 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC5 or N6000?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC5 or N6000?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 76 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC5 or N6000?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 74 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC5 or N6000?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 74 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC5 or N6000?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 69 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology