Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 44 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 44 + 46 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC5 +369Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 70 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 72
Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC5 +172Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 74 72 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
72
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC5 +369Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 69 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72
Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC5 +562Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 60 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
73
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC5 +469Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes CF1 Reviews found online 73 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 72 | 69 |
| Wet | 73 | 72 |
| Comfort | 72 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC5
Proxes CF1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
Tire B Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | B · Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Toyo Proxes CF1
Narrow edge: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 67 vs 62 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 72 vs 69 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 72 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes CF1?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes CF1?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes CF1?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 72 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes CF1?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes CF1?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 67 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology