Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 44 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 44 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC5 and Proxes ST are level at 72.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Level72Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 75 75 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 72
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Proxes ST +275Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 74 77 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison66Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 64 Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Level72Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 74 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72
Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Proxes ST +269Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 72 ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
73
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC5 +271Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 Proxes ST Reviews found online 73 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 72 |
| Dry | 72 | 72 |
| Wet | 73 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 72 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiMaxContact MC5
Proxes ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
Tire B Proxes ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
- Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning
Cons
- Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
- A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
- Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Toyo Proxes ST
Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 and Toyo Proxes ST are within 2 points overall. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes ST?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC5 or Proxes ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology