tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 44 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

ContiMaxContact MC5 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ContiMaxContact MC5 or BluEarth Es ES32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC5 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7873

    ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 76

    Wet

    ContiMaxContact MC5 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7876

    ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 76

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Comfort

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7676

    ContiMaxContact MC5: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.4 = 74

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 69

    Treadwear

    ContiMaxContact MC5 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 76

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC5BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online7677
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC5Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 74 72
Dry 74 71
Wet 76 75
Comfort 74 74
Treadwear 69 67
Handling (owners) 76 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiMaxContact MC5

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC5

Pros

  • Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
  • High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
  • Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals

Cons

  • Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
  • Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
  • Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC5 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC5

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better dry. Where the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 74 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology