Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 44 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiMaxContact MC5 is ahead, 71–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 67 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC5 +963Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) – 58 Reviews found online 75 69 -
73
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC5 +469Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) – 67 Reviews found online 74 73 -
72
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC5 +666Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) – 62 Reviews found online 75 73 -
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) – 65 -
67
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC5 +562Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 BluEarth RV02 Professional tests (TWG score) – 67 Reviews found online 68 54 -
73
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC5 +370Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC5 BluEarth RV02 Reviews found online 73 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 66 |
| Dry | 72 | 63 |
| Wet | 73 | 69 |
| Comfort | 72 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 62 |
| Handling | 73 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiMaxContact MC5
BluEarth RV02
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
Tire B BluEarth RV02
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Yokohama BluEarth RV02
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 72 vs 63 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 72 vs 66 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 67 vs 62 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 73 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.