Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 41 reviews
Cooper Zeon CS Sport looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Cooper Zeon CS Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 41 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Zeon CS Sport is ahead, 77–72
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 8 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 16 in 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Zeon CS Sport +377Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Zeon CS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 77 82 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
Zeon CS Sport: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 81.7 = 77
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Zeon CS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Zeon CS Sport +982Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Zeon CS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 79 (est.) Reviews found online 73 87 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73
Zeon CS Sport: 60% × 79.4 (est.) + 40% × 86.7 = 82
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Zeon CS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Zeon CS Sport +776Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Zeon CS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 80 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
Zeon CS Sport: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 80 = 76
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Zeon CS Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Zeon CS Sport +872Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Zeon CS Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 63 72 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
Zeon CS Sport: 60% × 72.2 + 40% × 72.4 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +475Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Zeon CS Sport Reviews found online 79 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Cooper Zeon CS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 77 |
| Dry | 74 | 77 |
| Wet | 73 | 82 |
| Comfort | 69 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
Zeon CS Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Zeon CS Sport
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- High value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Potential for premature replacement under high-mileage or aggressive use
- Less rigid sidewall feel compared to some dedicated performance run-flat tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Cooper Zeon CS Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Cooper Zeon CS Sport
Winner: Cooper Zeon CS Sport — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Where the Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Cooper Zeon CS Sport rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 82 vs 73 on wet.
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 72 vs 64 on treadwear.
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 76 vs 69 on comfort.
Cooper Zeon CS Sport scores 77 vs 74 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or Zeon CS Sport?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Zeon CS Sport?
Cooper Zeon CS Sport, 82 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Zeon CS Sport?
Cooper Zeon CS Sport, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Zeon CS Sport?
Cooper Zeon CS Sport, 76 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Zeon CS Sport?
Cooper Zeon CS Sport, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology