Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 41 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Dunlop SP Sport 300 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 21 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 72–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 21 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1559Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 SP Sport 300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 77 55 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
SP Sport 300: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1162Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 SP Sport 300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 59 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73
SP Sport 300: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1257Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 SP Sport 300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 52 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
SP Sport 300: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +163Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 SP Sport 300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 63 61 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
SP Sport 300: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +2851Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 SP Sport 300 Reviews found online 79 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Dunlop SP Sport 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 60 |
| Dry | 74 | 59 |
| Wet | 73 | 62 |
| Comfort | 69 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
SP Sport 300
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B SP Sport 300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and mileage, with many users reporting up to 40,000 to 50,000+ miles (or 80,000 km)
- Low road noise levels during the majority of the tire's lifespan
- Reliable dry and wet grip for everyday city and highway driving
Cons
- Firm, hard ride quality that some drivers find lacking in comfort
- Increased road noise and steering wheel vibration as the tread wears down to around 3mm
- Subpar wet weather traction reported by a few users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Dunlop SP Sport 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 15″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Dunlop SP Sport 300
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 79 vs 51 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 59 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 73 vs 62 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or SP Sport 300?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or SP Sport 300?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 73 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or SP Sport 300?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or SP Sport 300?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or SP Sport 300?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology