Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiMaxContact MC6 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 19 tests Owners 59 · 3,335 reviews
“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +277Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 78 64 -
71
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +576Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 72 68 -
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +664Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 68 Reviews found online 70 59 -
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 -
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1055Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 61 Reviews found online 64 46 -
76
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1660Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 76 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 68 |
| Dry | 75 | 77 |
| Wet | 71 | 76 |
| Comfort | 70 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 55 |
| Handling | 76 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiMaxContact MC6
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 receives mixed reviews from the community, with some users praising its solid performance, great value, and good grip compared to competitors, while others note concerns regarding longevity, stock wear, and variations in ratings across different sizes. Discussions also highlight specific variant differences, such as the K127 standard version versus the K127e Tesla-specific version.
“Small tire size change having different ratings? (Hankook Ventus S1 Evo3) Hi all, I'm looking for a good all round tire for my MX5 (I'm in the non snowy regions of the UK so summer tires) and a pretty popular recommendation are the Ventus S1 Evo 3s. At the MX5's stock size of 205/45/R17 they are rated at A for fuel and wet performance, and 68db of noise, which is great! However I'd like to size up to 215/45/R17, and for whatever reason the ratings drop to B for fuel and wet performance, and most importantly to me, 71db of noise. I was just wondering how such a small difference in size changes things quite drastically? I know these ratings aren't that important, but it seems strange to me they'd change at all Thanks! Read more”
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
“F/S Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 235/35 R19 Hi Guys Selling a full set (4) Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 235/35 R19 summer tires, with 9/32 tread depth which is exactly the same depth when these ultra high performance tires are new. No punctures anywhere. Tires came of my 2024 VW GTI with less than 3k miles on the odometer. The production date on the tires is 3324 which means 33rd week of 2024.This translates to late August 2024. $500/obo but no shipping. Local pick up only. I am in Long Island NY. Message if interested. Read more”
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if wet matters most to you.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 60 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 65 vs 55 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 76 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.