tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Kumho Ecsta KU39 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 125 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 72, Ecsta KU39 71.

Check price on Amazon · ContiMaxContact MC6 Check price on Amazon · Ecsta KU39
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Ecsta KU39
Tire BKumho

Ecsta KU39

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 125 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Ecsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7774

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    Ecsta KU39: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 72

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Ecsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7374

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73

    Ecsta KU39: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Ecsta KU39 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Ecsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7071

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69

    Ecsta KU39: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 64

    Treadwear

    Ecsta KU39 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Ecsta KU39
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6363

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    Ecsta KU39: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta KU39. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 79

    Handling (owners)

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Ecsta KU39
    Reviews found online7971
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Kumho Ecsta KU39
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 74 72
Wet 73 73
Comfort 69 70
Treadwear 64 65
Handling (owners) 79 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiMaxContact MC6

± 8

Ecsta KU39

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Ecsta KU39

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Outstanding ride comfort and low road noise

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of steering sharpness or 'squirm' under heavy load
  • Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth approaches 3mm
All owner themes in the Ecsta KU39 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available34
Rim diameters19″ – 21″17″ – 19″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Kumho Ecsta KU39

Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Kumho Ecsta KU39 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 79 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC6 or Ecsta KU39?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Ecsta KU39?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Ecsta KU39?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Ecsta KU39?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Ecsta KU39?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology