Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Kumho Ecsta KU39 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiMaxContact MC6 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 125 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +470Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ecsta KU39 Reviews found online 77 72 -
72
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +171Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ecsta KU39 Reviews found online 73 72 -
70
Comfort
Level70Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ecsta KU39 Reviews found online 70 70 -
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +164Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ecsta KU39 Reviews found online 64 63 -
76
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +769Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 Ecsta KU39 Reviews found online 76 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Kumho Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 69 |
| Dry | 74 | 70 |
| Wet | 72 | 71 |
| Comfort | 70 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 64 |
| Handling | 76 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
ContiMaxContact MC6
69
/ 100
Ecsta KU39
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B Ecsta KU39
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Outstanding ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of steering sharpness or 'squirm' under heavy load
- Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth approaches 3mm
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Kumho Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 17″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
69
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta KU39
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 70 on dry.
Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.