Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Proxes CF2 leads, 72–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BToyo

Proxes CF2

Summer

Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 76 · 110 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes CF2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–67
    Reviews found online7777
  2. 72

    Wet

    Proxes CF2 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes CF2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–69
    Reviews found online7378
  3. 70

    Comfort

    Proxes CF2 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes CF2
    Reviews found online7076
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF2 +5
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes CF2
    Reviews found online6473
  5. 76

    Handling

    Proxes CF2 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes CF2
    Reviews found online7677
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Toyo Proxes CF2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Toyo Proxes CF2
Relative Score 71 72
Dry 74 71
Wet 72 73
Comfort 70 73
Treadwear 65 70
Handling 76 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiMaxContact MC6

Proxes CF2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Proxes CF2

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling

Cons

  • Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
  • Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
  • Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
All owner themes in the Proxes CF2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Toyo Proxes CF2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available355
Rim diameters19″ – 21″13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Toyo Proxes CF2

Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Toyo Proxes CF2 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on dry. Toyo Proxes CF2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 73 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Narrow edge

Proxes CF2

Amazon