tirewheelguide

Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Toyo Proxes RA1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

ContiMaxContact MC6 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes RA1
Tire BToyo

Proxes RA1

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Proxes RA1 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7779

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7361

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–34

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7066

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Proxes RA1 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6468

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 76

    Handling (owners)

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Proxes RA1
    Reviews found online7673
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Toyo Proxes RA1
Relative Score 72 69
Dry 74 75
Wet 72 64
Snow – 49
Comfort 70 67
Noise – 68
Treadwear 65 67
Handling (owners) 76 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiMaxContact MC6

Proxes RA1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Proxes RA1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip that remains consistent even as the tread wears down.
  • Superior tire life compared to many other dedicated track-focused compounds.
  • Predictable breakaway characteristics that provide driver confidence at the limit.

Cons

  • Performance can become 'greasy' if the tire is overdriven or overheated during long sessions.
  • Requires proper heat cycling and break-in procedures to achieve optimal performance.
  • Sensitive to alignment settings, which can lead to accelerated or uneven wear if not managed.
All owner themes in the Proxes RA1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Toyo Proxes RA1
CategorySummerSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available37
Rim diameters19″ – 21″15″ – 18″
Tread depth—8/32″
UTQG—100 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Toyo Proxes RA1

Narrow edge: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better wet and comfort. Where the Toyo Proxes RA1 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes RA1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or Proxes RA1?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology