Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 and Advan Sport V105S are level at 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online7775
  2. 72

    Wet

    Advan Sport V105S +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online7376
  3. 70

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online7067
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online6465
  5. 76

    Handling

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6Advan Sport V105S
    Reviews found online7672
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V105S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 74 72
Wet 72 75
Comfort 70 68
Treadwear 65 65
Handling 76 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiMaxContact MC6

Advan Sport V105S

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B Advan Sport V105S

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to aquaplaning
  • Stiff sidewalls providing sharp steering response and direct feedback

Cons

  • Shorter tread life or faster-than-average wear noted by some users
  • Stiffer sidewall results in a firmer, less plush ride quality
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the Advan Sport V105S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available32
Rim diameters19″ – 21″19″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S

Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Yokohama Advan Sport V105S are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling. Yokohama Advan Sport V105S is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 72 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Sport V105S scores 75 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V105S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Too close to call

ContiMaxContact MC6

Amazon