Head-to-head

Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

ContiProContact SSR is ahead, 66–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    ContiProContact SSR +8
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRContiSportContact 5 SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6451

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    ContiProContact SSR +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRContiSportContact 5 SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6959

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    ContiProContact SSR +9
    56
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRContiSportContact 5 SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6146

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 56

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    ContiProContact SSR +12
    48
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRContiSportContact 5 SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5639

    ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.3 = 60

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 40% × 62.7 (est.) + 60% × 38.9 = 48

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    ContiProContact SSR +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRContiSportContact 5 SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6855

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 62

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact SSR +16
    50
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRContiSportContact 5 SSR
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6539

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContact SSRContinental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Relative Score 66 57
Dry 65 57
Wet 70 62
Snow 65 56
Comfort 60 48
Noise 67 62
Treadwear 66 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiProContact SSR

± 8

ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact SSR B · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available125
Rim diameters17″17″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG400 A A280 - 420 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact SSR

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Winner: Continental ContiProContact SSR — better treadwear, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 66 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 60 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 56 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact SSR
Tire B · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 70 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 60 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or ContiSportContact 5 SSR?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 66 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology