tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiProContact SSR and Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat are level at 62.

Check price on Amazon · ContiProContact SSR Check price on Amazon · Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +4
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 62

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6364

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 65

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    ContiProContact SSR +1
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online4948

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 59

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online62–

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact SSR +12
    50
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online5939

    ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 62

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContact SSRSport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Reviews found online5461
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiProContact SSRContinental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Relative Score 62 62
Dry 62 66
Wet 65 65
Snow 61 –
Comfort 59 58
Noise 65 –
Treadwear 62 50
Handling (owners) 54 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiProContact SSR

Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
  • Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
  • Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
  • Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
  • Elevated road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact SSR B · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG400 A A—
Treadwear warranty40,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact SSR

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact SSR and Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on treadwear. Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat is stronger on handling and dry. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 62 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 61 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 66 vs 62 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact SSR
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 58 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental ContiProContact SSR, 62 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology