tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Goodyear Eagle LS-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 148 owner reviews. How we score

ContiProContact is ahead, 64–57

Check price on Amazon · ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle LS-2

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 148 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    ContiProContact +12
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6649

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    ContiProContact +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6357

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    ContiProContact +2
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5653

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    ContiProContact +4
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5852

    ContiProContact: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    Eagle LS-2: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.6 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 68

    Noise

    ContiProContact +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7056

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact +7
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6048

    ContiProContact: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    Eagle LS-2: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle LS-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    ContiProContact +13
    49
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactEagle LS-2
    Reviews found online6249
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiProContactGoodyear Eagle LS-2
Relative Score 64 57
Dry 67 55
Wet 65 61
Snow 62 60
Comfort 61 57
Noise 68 62
Treadwear 62 55
Handling (owners) 62 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiProContact

± 7

Eagle LS-2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B Eagle LS-2

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional ride comfort
  • Precise dry handling and solid straight-line stability
  • Good overall value and fuel efficiency

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise over time due to cupping
  • Mediocre wet and winter traction when worn
All owner themes in the Eagle LS-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5622
Rim diameters15″ – 19″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 12/32″9 - 12/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A360 - 400 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure44 - 51 psi44 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Goodyear Eagle LS-2

Winner: Continental ContiProContact — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiProContact scores 67 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental ContiProContact scores 68 vs 62 on noise.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle LS-2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Continental ContiProContact, 65 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Continental ContiProContact, 67 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Continental ContiProContact, 68 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Continental ContiProContact, 61 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or Eagle LS-2?

Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology