Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Kumho Solus KH15 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 24 owner reviews. How we score

ContiProContact leads, 65–62 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus KH15
Tire BKumho

Solus KH15

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 24 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    ContiProContact +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6657

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67

    Solus KH15: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Solus KH15. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    ContiProContact +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6362

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    Solus KH15: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus KH15. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online56–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Solus KH15 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    ContiProContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62

    Solus KH15: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact or Solus KH15. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Solus KH15 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5961

    ContiProContact: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    Solus KH15: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus KH15. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    ContiProContact +10
    53
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactSolus KH15
    Reviews found online6353
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact vs Kumho Solus KH15: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContactKumho Solus KH15
Relative Score 65 62
Dry 67 61
Wet 65 64
Snow 62 –
Comfort 62 65
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 62 63
Handling (owners) 63 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiProContact

± 8

Solus KH15

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B Solus KH15

Pros

  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable wet weather performance and water evacuation

Cons

  • Prone to wheel spin under hard acceleration
  • Lack of grip for performance-oriented driving
  • Noticeable road noise reported by some users
All owner themes in the Solus KH15 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Kumho Solus KH15
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available561
Rim diameters15″ – 19″18″
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Kumho Solus KH15

Narrow edge: Continental ContiProContact — better handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus KH15 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiProContact scores 63 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiProContact scores 67 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus KH15 scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Kumho Solus KH15

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or Solus KH15?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or Solus KH15?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or Solus KH15?

Continental ContiProContact, 67 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or Solus KH15?

Kumho Solus KH15, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or Solus KH15?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology