Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ContiProContact leads, 61–58 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BLaufenn

G FIT AS

All Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    ContiProContact +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online6257
  2. 62

    Wet

    ContiProContact +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online6055
  3. 59

    Snow

    ContiProContact +1
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online5251
  4. 63

    Comfort

    G FIT AS +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online5660
  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online66–
  6. 60

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact +5
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online5648
  7. 58

    Handling

    ContiProContact +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactG FIT AS
    Reviews found online5857
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiProContact vs Laufenn G FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiProContactLaufenn G FIT AS
Relative Score 61 58
Dry 64 61
Wet 62 59
Snow 59 58
Comfort 63 64
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 60 55
Handling 58 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiProContact

G FIT AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B G FIT AS

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent dry pavement grip and handling

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
  • Inadequate winter and snow performance
  • Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
All owner themes in the G FIT AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Laufenn G FIT AS
Category—All Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available561
Rim diameters15″ – 19″16″
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Laufenn G FIT AS

Winner: Continental ContiProContact — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact scores 60 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiProContact scores 64 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 59 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

61

Narrow edge

ContiProContact

Amazon