Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 79 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiProContact vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
ContiProContact is ahead, 64–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
ContiProContact +661Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 66 57 ContiProContact: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67
G FIT AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
ContiProContact +659Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 63 55 ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
G FIT AS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Snow
ContiProContact +359Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 56 51 ContiProContact: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62
G FIT AS: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 59
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
62
Comfort
G FIT AS +163Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 59 59 ContiProContact: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59 = 62
G FIT AS: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 63
No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact or G FIT AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 70 – ContiProContact: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 68
No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
ContiProContact +755Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 59 47 ContiProContact: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
G FIT AS: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for G FIT AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
63
Handling (owners)
ContiProContact +459Why this score
Source ContiProContact G FIT AS Reviews found online 63 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact | Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 59 |
| Dry | 67 | 61 |
| Wet | 65 | 59 |
| Snow | 62 | 59 |
| Comfort | 62 | 63 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
ContiProContact
59
/ 100
G FIT AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiProContact
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise
- Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers
Cons
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
- Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
- Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
Tire B G FIT AS
Pros
- Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent dry pavement grip and handling
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction with frequent wheel spin from a stop
- Inadequate winter and snow performance
- Rapid tread wear or early failure reported by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact | B · Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 56 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Continental ContiProContact
59
/ 100
Laufenn G FIT AS
Winner: Continental ContiProContact — better treadwear, dry and wet. Where the Laufenn G FIT AS is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Laufenn G FIT AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiProContact scores 67 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiProContact scores 65 vs 59 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 59 on snow.
Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiProContact or G FIT AS?
Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or G FIT AS?
Continental ContiProContact, 65 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or G FIT AS?
Continental ContiProContact, 67 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiProContact or G FIT AS?
Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or G FIT AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or G FIT AS?
Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology