tirewheelguide

Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiProContact vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiProContact and N FERA SUR4 are level at 62.

Check price on Amazon · ContiProContact Check price on Amazon · N FERA SUR4
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    N FERA SUR4 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6273

    ContiProContact: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 62

    Wet

    ContiProContact +7
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6050

    ContiProContact: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 59

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 59

    No road tests of snow for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ContiProContact +2
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5651

    ContiProContact: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    ContiProContact: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    No road tests of noise for ContiProContact. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    ContiProContact +5
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5647

    ContiProContact: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    N FERA SUR4 +13
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiProContactN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online5871
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiProContactNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 62 62
Dry 64 71
Wet 62 55
Snow 59 –
Comfort 62 60
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 60 55
Handling (owners) 58 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiProContact

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiProContact

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Low road noise
  • Strong dry and wet grip for most drivers

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to impact bubbles and damage from potholes
  • Some complaints about poor wet traction and braking performance
  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by a minority of users
All owner themes in the ContiProContact review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available56—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth9 - 12/32″—
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiProContact

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact and Nexen N FERA SUR4 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact is stronger on wet and treadwear. Nexen N FERA SUR4 is stronger on handling and dry. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiProContact scores 62 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 64 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiProContact scores 60 vs 55 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiProContact or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact or N FERA SUR4?

Continental ContiProContact, 62 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact or N FERA SUR4?

Nexen N FERA SUR4, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact or N FERA SUR4?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiProContact or N FERA SUR4?

Continental ContiProContact, 60 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology