Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop GP Racer D211 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Dunlop GP Racer D211 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
GP Racer D211 leads, 76–73 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
GP Racer D211 +681Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 79 88 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
GP Racer D211: 60% × 76.1 (est.) + 40% × 87.7 = 81
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
GP Racer D211 +275Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 74 77 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
GP Racer D211: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
GP Racer D211 +274Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 77 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
GP Racer D211: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.5 = 74
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 68 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
GP Racer D211: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
GP Racer D211 +887Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack GP Racer D211 Reviews found online 79 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Dunlop GP Racer D211 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 76 |
| Dry | 75 | 81 |
| Wet | 73 | 75 |
| Comfort | 72 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSport Attack
GP Racer D211
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B GP Racer D211
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip comparable to dedicated racing slicks
- Fast warm-up times providing confidence-inspiring feedback
- Predictable handling and stability during aggressive cornering
Cons
- Can feel slippery and unstable during the initial cold-start phase
- High price point in certain markets
- Performance is heavily dependent on maintaining correct tire pressures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Dunlop GP Racer D211 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSport Attack
Dunlop GP Racer D211
Narrow edge: Dunlop GP Racer D211 — better handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Dunlop GP Racer D211 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop GP Racer D211 scores 87 vs 79 on handling.
Dunlop GP Racer D211 scores 81 vs 75 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or GP Racer D211?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or GP Racer D211?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or GP Racer D211?
Dunlop GP Racer D211, 81 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or GP Racer D211?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or GP Racer D211?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology