Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSport Attack is ahead, 73–67
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +1065Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 79 64 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
Angel ST: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
ContiSport Attack +370Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 70 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Angel ST: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
ContiSport Attack +468Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 68 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
Angel ST: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.5 = 68
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSport Attack +265Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 64 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Angel ST: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiSport Attack +1465Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Angel ST Reviews found online 79 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 67 |
| Dry | 75 | 65 |
| Wet | 73 | 70 |
| Comfort | 72 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
ContiSport Attack
67
/ 100
Angel ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Angel ST
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and high cornering confidence
- Reliable and predictable wet weather performance
- Light, neutral steering and overall straight-line stability
Cons
- Rear tire tends to wear out suddenly or rapidly once it passes the halfway mark
- Requires a short warm-up time (2-5 minutes) to reach optimal grip
- Shorter total mileage lifespan reported by aggressive riders or heavy commuters
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Continental ContiSport Attack
67
/ 100
Pirelli Angel ST
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 79 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 73 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Pirelli Angel ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or Angel ST?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 73 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or Angel ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology