Tests – · none yet Owners 79 · 9 reviews
Dunlop GP Racer D211 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Dunlop GP Racer D211 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiSportAttack 2 77, GP Racer D211 76.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
GP Racer D211 +181Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 87 88 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 80
GP Racer D211: 60% × 76.1 (est.) + 40% × 87.7 = 81
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
78
Wet
ContiSportAttack 2 +375Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 81 77 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 78
GP Racer D211: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 75
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +474Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 77 ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 82.1 = 78
GP Racer D211: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 76.5 = 74
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 GP Racer D211 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 68 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
GP Racer D211: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for GP Racer D211. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
86
Handling (owners)
GP Racer D211 +187Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 GP Racer D211 Reviews found online 86 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Dunlop GP Racer D211 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 76 |
| Dry | 80 | 81 |
| Wet | 78 | 75 |
| Comfort | 78 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSportAttack 2
GP Racer D211
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B GP Racer D211
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip comparable to dedicated racing slicks
- Fast warm-up times providing confidence-inspiring feedback
- Predictable handling and stability during aggressive cornering
Cons
- Can feel slippery and unstable during the initial cold-start phase
- High price point in certain markets
- Performance is heavily dependent on maintaining correct tire pressures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Dunlop GP Racer D211 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Dunlop GP Racer D211
Too close to call: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 and Dunlop GP Racer D211 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 is stronger on comfort and wet. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Dunlop GP Racer D211 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 74 on comfort.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 75 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportAttack 2 or GP Racer D211?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or GP Racer D211?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 75 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or GP Racer D211?
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 81 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or GP Racer D211?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or GP Racer D211?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology