Tests – · none yet Owners 79 · 9 reviews
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Michelin Pilot Road 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportAttack 2 leads, 77–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 19 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +773Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 87 76 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 80
Pilot Road 4: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
78
Wet
Level78Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 81 81 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 78
Pilot Road 4: 60% × 76.1 (est.) + 40% × 80.5 = 78
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +573Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 75 ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 82.1 = 78
Pilot Road 4: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.8 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Pilot Road 4 +370Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
Pilot Road 4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
86
Handling (owners)
ContiSportAttack 2 +1175Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Pilot Road 4 Reviews found online 86 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Michelin Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 77 | 74 |
| Dry | 80 | 73 |
| Wet | 78 | 78 |
| Comfort | 78 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSportAttack 2
Pilot Road 4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B Pilot Road 4
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip and performance
- Impressive tread life and mileage longevity for touring and commuting
- Predictable and confident handling in everyday dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Slippery when brand new, requiring a cautious break-in period
- Tread pattern can cause movement or a vague front-end feel in warmer weather
- Some riders experienced uneven wear or quicker wear on the front tire
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Michelin Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Michelin Pilot Road 4
Narrow edge: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Michelin Pilot Road 4 if treadwear matters most to you. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Road 4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 86 vs 75 on handling.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 80 vs 73 on dry.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 73 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportAttack 2 or Pilot Road 4?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or Pilot Road 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or Pilot Road 4?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 80 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or Pilot Road 4?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 73 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or Pilot Road 4?
Michelin Pilot Road 4, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology