Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 16 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 146 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric is ahead, 71–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 146 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +1374Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 58 77 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
64
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +1377Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 62 79 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 64
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 75.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 77
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
46
Snow
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +2066Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 29 63 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 28.7 = 46
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
56
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +1369Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 50 69 ContiSportContact 3: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.4 = 56
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +565Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 50 64 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 60
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric +763Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 50 61 ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 56
Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison72Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 Eagle F1 Asymmetric Reviews found online – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 3 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 71 |
| Dry | 61 | 74 |
| Wet | 64 | 77 |
| Snow | 46 | 66 |
| Comfort | 56 | 69 |
| Noise | 60 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 3
Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction, inspiring high confidence in corners and heavy rain
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback near the limit
- Noticeably improved ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to rivals like Pirelli and Bridgestone
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly under spirited driving
- Poor performance and hazardous lack of grip in freezing temperatures, snow, or ice as a dedicated summer tire
- Prone to increased road noise, cupping, or tramlining as the tread wears down past halfway
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | 11 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 8 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A - B A | 240 - 300 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 3
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better snow, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 66 vs 46 on snow.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 74 vs 61 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 77 vs 64 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 69 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 77 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 66 vs 46 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 65 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 69 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 63 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology