Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 146 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric is ahead, 71–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +13
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5877

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +13
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online6279

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 64

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 75.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 77

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 46

    Snow

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +20
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online2963

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 57.3 (est.) + 40% × 28.7 = 46

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5069

    ContiSportContact 3: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.4 = 56

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5064

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 60

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5061

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 56

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Eagle F1 Asymmetric
    Reviews found online–72
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 3Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
Relative Score 58 71
Dry 61 74
Wet 64 77
Snow 46 66
Comfort 56 69
Noise 60 65
Treadwear 56 63
Handling (owners) – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportContact 3

± 8

Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction, inspiring high confidence in corners and heavy rain
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback near the limit
  • Noticeably improved ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to rivals like Pirelli and Bridgestone

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear and shorter lifespan, particularly under spirited driving
  • Poor performance and hazardous lack of grip in freezing temperatures, snow, or ice as a dedicated summer tire
  • Prone to increased road noise, cupping, or tramlining as the tread wears down past halfway
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2211
Rim diameters16″ – 20″17″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″8 - 10/32″
UTQG280 A - B A240 - 300 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 3

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric — better snow, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 66 vs 46 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 74 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 77 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric scores 69 vs 56 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 3
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 77 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 66 vs 46 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 65 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 69 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 3 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric, 63 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology